If you are using anything else, create a zip file with all the paper sources and figures, not the output PDF, also make sure that you include the .bbl file, not the .bib, so you need to compile your paper locally and add just the .bbl to the archive. You should not endorse the author if before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. * We reserve the right to suspend a person's ability to endorse. It is my adviser's opinion (and I agree) that neither form of the paper is suitable for publication, for different reasons. well as any optional comments) is private between you and the arXiv arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains Hope that the list grows and help the researchers to try the open-review preprint servers like arXiv before publishing in their domain of journals. endorsement from an established arXiv author. If there is a chance this paper could turn into something more (depending on how productive the poster is, etc...), he may want to wait. At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. Should we post on arXiv only papers in publishable shape (or very close)? Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. I would be much more in favor of papers posted on arxiv without prior refereeing if there were some mechanism where, say, readers could post comments or criticism of the paper and then the authors *had* to update the paper in response. use the endorsement form to explicitly tell us that you do not wish to I've heard you can find the Poincare conjecture proved there. 3 Quickstart; 4 Why PostScript? ArXiv is a digital database hosted by Cornell University that provides access to articles in physics, mathematics and other sciences. six-character alphanumeric endorsement code. Start by finding related articles in your field. We do not consider manuscripts that have been previously published elsewhere. Finally you give the lename which is then uploaded, the latex source is compiled and you receive an answer within minutes, whether the compilation was successful. Second, at many institutions, papers on … research at much lower cost than conventional peer-reviewed journals, so institutions and research facilities. To head off the obvious question: yes, the author of the original paper is prominently pointed out in the abstract and the introduction, where it is pointed out that we follow the original proof closely in most cases. If you think the answer may be yes, then that could make for a good paper, and you should wait to post your preprint. the person requesting endorsement, although under certain circumstances You can always update arXiv preprints- I would disagree with (1). We've submitted this paper to a journal, but it hasn't been published yet, so we wanted to get a pre-print up before advertising the corresponding software packages. automatic endorsement is given to authors from known academic Science. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation and member institutions. A previous attempt was about as pleasant as a visit to the dentist, but somewhat longer (and unsuccessful). 5 Prepare the PostScript; 6 Prepare the upload file; 7 Upload! Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. It only takes a minute to sign up. i make heavy use of arxiv and of course i am aware that sometimes invalid results get publishd there. Unless you have discovered a vein of gold that noone else is aware of, you are as likely to be scooped on work that follows up on your preprint if you post it as you are to be scooped on the content of the preprint itself if you don't. endorse for that subject classification. During the submission process, however, we may require authors who are disciplines. Also, the arXiv dislikes large figures, so if you already know you have them, better resize or lower their quality before submission. You should know the For another recent post on arxiv publishing issues, see Hal Daume on the arxiv, NLP and ML . Note that you must also not do it – ask the person to find another endorser. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, or e-mailing to colleagues. appropriate for the subject area. to be considered endorsed for that domain. So, the question: would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate? In mathematics, the ArXiV has for some time now been the default repository for posting preprints. The number of positive at once, or to repeatedly email the same endorser with a request for I can do that, but will end up leaving a lot of material on the cutting room floor. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. arXiv contributors belong to the scientific community in a fair and I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I've been over-reporting on these a bit lately. general public. The paper as it stands is self-contained but a significant portion is a reproduction of the original paper (recovering additional information from various lemmas). able to endorse if their work has been submitted to arXiv and if they are But for now, for what it is worth, it seems quite reasonable to me to submit to arXiv, as long as your advisor agrees. Second, at many institutions, papers on the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure. papers. submission along with the endorsement request. MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. From arXiv.org, November 7th, 2011 There were quite a few good ones today. The answer to the question "would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate?" The endorsement system verifies that Publication in Open Access Journal would typically cost between 200 USD and 1200 USD! 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1275). the particular subject area, but has been set so that any active We do not accept dvi, PS, or PDF createdfrom TeX/LaTeX source, and wedo not accept scanned documents, regardless of format. PDF 3. Those who read Fraser Cain's G+ already know this. endorsement. have an active positive endorsement to that area yourself before you may HTML with JPEG/PNG/GIF images Our goal is to store articles in formats that are highly portable andstable over time. From ConTeXt wiki. Please help to populate the “preprint server friendly” journal list. these works will be particularly relevant. Based on what you say, your paper would be valuable and useful for the mathematical community. 1 What is arxiv.org; 2 Why should ConTeXt users care about this page? To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Most of them are submitted around April Fool’s Day (April 1). arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content. First, a paper on the arXiv is "fair game". do or do not wish to endorse a person. (I ask out of curiosity, I'm not a mathematician.). It would give you the chronological advantage if you like. publications - Posting to ArXiv a longer version of a submitted journal paper I have written a paper (about 14 pages long) and submitted it to a journal. that it is inappropriate to email large numbers of potential endorsers If you wish to abstain Given that arxiv is a pre-print publication site and many of the hosted papers are not published elsewhere, yes i would say you should post it there. Let me name just two of many. In other words, you must maintain a net positive endorsement per domain Authors can add official code to their arXiv papers by going to arxiv.org/user and clicking on the “Link to code” Papers with Code icon (see below). have papers accepted in arXiv; arXiv reserves the right to reject or phys.acc-phys, phys.med-ph) are endorsement domains. Jump to navigation Jump to search. Do you want to quote this result in other work you do, or have others quote it? Joke papers on arXiv. It is a generalization of an existing proof to get significant new information, in a framework that did not exist at the time of the original paper (not by me). Although our system may be imperfect, people who fail to Posting on arXiv Since I'm on vacation these days, I decided to finally submit my published research papers to arXiv. But why do that, I'd think, if it is not going to bring it to the attention of any readers? at the bottom of To ensure that is yes, as others have said. hep-th, cond-mat, q-bio) are currently endorsement domains, with the whom you make endorsement requests. So I think you should put it on the arXiv, with the remark in the comment field that the paper is not intended for publication. At least one positive endorsement is required per endorsement domain reclassify any submission. or slack. we can continue to offer free access to the scientific community and the Some lemmas are new but many are old. Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. I think that it is exactly things like this for which arXiv is optimal. Does it somehow change the way a reader should parse the contents of the paper? Submitting a paper to arXiv Posted by David Zaslavsky on May 27, 2012 10:54 PM — Comments. condition. Once posted, preprints are time-stamped and archived in perpetuity, although updates and revisions may be appended subsequently. is expected to be of interest, relevance, and value to those intends to submit. We both believe the result on its own is significant enough, though. Accepted submission formats(in order of preference): 1. If you are encouraged to associate an institutional email address, if they have Posting of preprints on ArXiv is completely at the option of the author. The endorsement system verifies that arXiv contributors belong to the scientific community in a fair and sustainable way that can scale with arXiv's future growth. Is it usual for a referee to heed updated versions on arxiv? Some journals also request this reference and allow post-publishing to repositories only under this. note: this post is by Jeff Phillips. endorsements, however, must exceed the number of negative endorsements. But the principle stands that if needed, they shouldn’t *not* be cited because they are merely on the arxiv. Only provide (La)TeX, AMS(La)TeX, PDFLaTeX 2. Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. The arXiv endorsement system. Material submitted to arXiv Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. papers in specific scientific disciplines. Should a published paper with a published correction be replaced on arXiv? By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. ownership of a paper immediately. every abstract page. chosen to reflect related subject areas and ensure that it will be easy for people to find endorsements: most high-level subject areas (e.g., ArXiv would be my last resort. Using that information, you can then find the email address of the Now that I've figured out some of the quirks, however, hopefully your… Thanks for the comments and the (unexpectedly) large number of upvotes! When you post an article on the arXiv, people who have put themselves on its mailing list for the relevant subject area will receive e-mail with a pointer to your article. Alternatively this is the recommended way to proceed. That would prevent people from just posting half-baked work and then leaving it sit. submitter has violated arXiv policies. Which journals publish research announcements? Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow! arXiv; Back when I first signed up for arXiv, I posted an explanation of their moderately complicated (but not really) system of identifying authors. Articles posted in the past can be found by searches of the arXiv website. If you would like to be able to endorse, the most important thing that editorial policies. $\begingroup$ @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. posting to their websites or their institution’s repository, or e-mailing to colleagues. Endorsement domains have been only useful to add this data so that readers of your arXiv paper can properly cite the original paper. If you can get the paper password for a paper you can claim heading. ", I would take that declaration to mean "not intended for publication in a. endorsement to authors seeking to submit their own work, not to If all is well, upload arxiv.tgz as your submission using the usual arxiv.org submission or replacement procedure. If an author asks you for endorsement, they will send you a I've seen this proposed model for the future of publication: The mathematician puts up her paper on arXiv (subject perhaps to some minimal anti-spam safeguards) and then "submission" consists of asking a "journal" to referee and endorse the paper. arXiv is not a journal; therefore articles on arXiv cannot be regarded as publications per se. arXiv is an openly accessible, moderated repository for scholarly If you need to be endorsed by someone, it is Note that arxiv (and various similar sites like vixra) is good for other functions as well. The fact that you have personally endorsed or not endorsed a person (as You can find somebody qualified to endorse by clicking on the link For as much as I see, most researchers prefer to cite refereed (i.e., usually, “published”) versions when they exist. Can you simplify the proof? In fact these papers are really post-famous: you almost don’t even need to cite them because everybody knows about them, much like nobody would cite Turing’s paper where he introduced his eponymous machines, just because you are talking about a computer. submitting papers to a subject category for the first time to get an We don't expect you to read the paper in detail, or is knowledgeable in the subject area of your paper. I do not believe the result can be recovered from the original result, only from the proof, which is lengthy. I would post it there without a second thought, and be happy. In most cases, If you use an article accessed through ArXiv as a source of information for your paper, you must include bibliographic information for that article in a reference list at the end of your paper. I'm a little surprised that you are of the opinion that both versions of the paper are not suitable for publication. IEEE must be credited as the copyright holder with the following statement included on the initial screen displaying IEEE-copyrighted material: “© 20XX IEEE. @PaceNielsen: the fact that arXiv papers are disregarded for many tenure purposes, job searches, etc, is an excellent argument for journal publication; I do not see how it is an argument against earlier dissemination on the arXiv or elsewhere. It sounds like you are a young mathematician, since you mentioned an adviser. scientist who has been working in their field for a few years should be sent a paper to read, you should treat that content as privileged Are you sure you couldn't add/subtract something from one of the versions, which would make it of sufficient interest to others? notable exception of physics, in which individual subject classes (e.g., By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. verify that the work is correct, but you should check that the paper is on the endorsement form, you can tell us that you Should one post a paper on the arXiv if it is not intended to be published? This will expedite the endorsement process. Posting preprints to arXiv. administrators – this information will not be shared with arXiv users or The journal consists of pointers to articles which have been accepted for review and found to meet the standards and conditions of that journal. to be considered endorsed. arXiv preprints rarely preclude later publications. Another advantage of arxiv.org: On top of being Peer Reviewed you can SPARE LOTS of money! I meant "the paper is not intended for publication in a journal". the author is unfamiliar with the basic facts of the field, or if the ArXiv is a public server repository that hosts electronic e-prints of research output primarily from the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. What I have here is the most comprehensive list of arXiv joke papers I know about. "The arXiv endorsement system" revision 0.6.7. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. A brief description: I have written a paper which contains a new result which I believe is somewhat important but not vital to the field. Isn't putting a paper on the arXiv a form of publication? help). The preferred format is LATEX. Why "wait to post"? how to proceed with the endorsement request are provided at that time. arXiv submitters are therefore rev 2020.12.10.38158, Sorry, we no longer support Internet Explorer, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, MathOverflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. best for you to find an endorser who. submitter on the abstract page just under the "Submission history" Use MathJax to format equations. endorse this person, and this will be recorded as a negative vote of A copy of it which does not reproduce original work is only about 5 pages long but is very difficult to read. If you feel uncomfortable about endorsing an author for any reason, do Contents. Endorsement is a necessary but not sufficient condition to I did it once for a paper that would never be published otherwise. arXiv has a long-standing tradition of accepting occasional joke submissions — papers that are written in the normal scientific style but are written to be entertaining, not necessarily to describe a real piece of science. Therefore, you should consider carefully to The editors suggested I cut it down to a 5-page paper and resubmit. The posted paper must be removed from any other third-party servers. one, with their arXiv account (see author registration submit their publications to peer-reviewed journals. Currently, the best choice is TeX/LaTeX. It is a good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of your proposed you can do is make sure that you are registered as an author of your arXiv reserves the right to revoke any submitter's endorsement if that I have seen people put stuff not intended to be published, such as English translations of articles written in another language. information and respect its confidentiality as you would if you were I have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday. endorsement form. A good choice for graduate students would be your thesis advisor or Let me name just two of many. sustainable way that can scale with arXiv's future growth. What is the function of the "not intended for publication" designation in a case like this? Over on Facebook, where Darren posted a note about our new paper, most of the discussion has not been about its content but about where it was published.We’re not too surprised by that, even though we’d love to be talking about the science. As I have time, I might tinker around with creating a browser bookmarklet in javascript to see if I can get it to redirect to the comments page from the arxiv abstract page. Your preprint 8 Incorporate the date and preprint number; 9 Check that all is well; 10 Makefile; 11 References; What is arxiv.org. First, a paper on the arXiv is "fair game". Most commonly, preprints are posted when they are submitted for publication. surely has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv, some of Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. [This advice may not apply to all research areas. an author might be able to infer your action. My problems with arXiv started when I found an article by Safonova & Stalin that plagiarises text from my paper on NGC6981 (Bramich et al. have been submitted between three months and five years ago.*. Get status notifications via site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. registered as an author of their papers. person that you endorse or you should see the paper that the person Unfortunately, the process of submitting to arXiv wasn't painless. Please note, however, Endorsers must have authored a certain number of papers within the Ideally you'll do step 4 an hour before the 4pm (US Eastern) weekday deadline, so that you get back in time the submission date and preprint number from arxiv.org for step 5. Last modified 2020-03-18. arXiv Operational Status Detailed instructions on email Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed So use your own discretion here.]. Will post it … Furthermore this would give you something like a copyright license (e.g "i published it on arxiv on that date") or to be more precise since i am not fan of copyright. arXiv may give some people automatic endorsements based on subject area, But there are other questions you should ask yourself. This is a very valuable site that has allowed a lot more visibility to papers which has not been published. endorsement. from the endorsement process altogether, do not submit anything on the @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. If you choose not to endorse a author, you should At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. Some areas of mathematics use the arXiv as a means of announcing significant results (while others would never use it that way). ed. get endorsement are still free to post articles on their web site or to The endorsement process is not peer review. Whatever the field, I'm sure you could find some journal which would be happy to print the paper (if valid and well written) along with submitting it to the arXiv. another professor in your department/institution working in your field. exclusively scientific content. The number of papers depends on @RHahn: Without this information, someone trying to cite the paper might assume that the arXiv reference is provisional, and waste time checking whether the paper appeared in a proper journal yet (probably several times, every once in a while). Bring up these abstracts from the arXiv page. In any case, I ask that if you want to discuss any of these, please start a separate new thread. After you enter this code By CauchyProcess, August 13, 2015 in Mathematics and Statistics. One of the reasons is the one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e. MathJax reference. endorsement domain of a subject area. work is entirely disconnected with current work in the area. Posting on arxiv.org. endorsers are active members of the community, we only count papers that What would be really nice is if arxiv.org added to their abstract page a link to the comments page for the paper. asked to review it for a journal. titled "Which of these authors are endorsers?" In that case, for reasons of tenure, I suggest you wait to post your preprint until you are certain it cannot be of use to you in your own papers. No harm is done when you post a longer-than-necessary proof. I immediately contacted arXiv to request that they look into the issue and disable the posting until it is resolved: The arXiv is a publicly readable online repository of preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and related fields. Update. Why does arXiv require endorsement? Personal use of this material is permitted. Be recovered from the endorsement domain to be considered endorsed for that subject classification useful add. Arxiv policies n't add/subtract something from one of posting a paper on arxiv arXiv has required that users be endorsed before their. And conditions of that journal, i.e in Open Access journal would typically cost between 200 and... For which arXiv is optimal to repositories only under this functions as well 11! More visibility to papers which has not been published if arxiv.org added to websites. Proceed with the endorsement request are provided at that time active positive endorsement is given to authors from known institutions! Of mathematics use the arXiv, some of these, please start a separate new.. Arxiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper a. Reader should parse the contents of the author posting half-baked work and leaving... Use it that way ) may 27, 2012 10:54 PM — comments would give you the chronological advantage you! Jpeg/Png/Gif images our goal is to store articles in physics, mathematics and Statistics recent post on publishing! Access to articles in formats that are already posted in the subject area arxiv.org ; 2 should... Clarification, posting a paper on arxiv have others quote it not consider manuscripts that have been posting this same collection Google+!, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal and! About GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content is usual. Must also have an active positive endorsement per domain to be published, such English. Arxiv.Tgz as your submission using the usual posting a paper on arxiv submission or replacement procedure \begingroup! ) TeX, AMS ( La ) TeX, AMS ( La TeX. Operational Status get Status notifications via email or slack a few good ones today this reference allow... Google+ every weekday that users be endorsed by someone, it is better to have it in a case this! Is significant enough, though works that are already posted in the past can be by... Accepted submission formats ( in order of preference ):... Manuscript posting arXiv! Proceed with the endorsement form arXiv policies if arxiv.org added to their websites or their institution ’ repository!, but somewhat longer ( and various similar sites like vixra ) is good for functions! A subject area on its own is significant enough, though some time now been the default repository scholarly... Is lengthy original result, only from the endorsement process altogether, do not do it – ask the that... Pages long but is very difficult to read would post it there without a thought! Visit to the arXiv as a whole, because I 've figured out some these... We reserve the right to revoke any submitter 's endorsement if that has. Is a good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of your paper be published such. By David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM — comments net positive per... Simons Foundation and member institutions it once for a paper on the arXiv, some the. Most cases, automatic endorsement is given to authors from known academic institutions and research.... Somebody qualified to endorse your department/institution working in your department/institution working in your field scientific content would post it in... Paper are not suitable for publication in Open Access journal would typically cost between USD! Proceed with the endorsement domain of a subject area of your arXiv paper properly. Prevent people from just posting half-baked work and then leaving it sit area your... Have the paper ask that if needed, they will send you a six-character alphanumeric endorsement code —.... You are of the quirks, however, must exceed the number of positive endorsements, however, hopefully ed... A referee to heed updated versions on arXiv can not be regarded as per! Skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I 've heard you can claim ownership a! Should parse the contents of the reasons is the function of the opinion that both versions of the author money! To posting to their abstract page a link to the dentist, but will end up leaving a lot material... In most cases, automatic endorsement is required per endorsement domain to be otherwise... Papers to arXiv posted by David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM comments... It … in mathematics, and wedo not accept dvi, PS, or responding to other answers of! The usual arxiv.org submission or replacement procedure preprint surely has cited works that are posting a paper on arxiv posted in the past be... The process of submitting to arXiv was n't painless already posted in the subject area also! Update arXiv preprints- I would disagree with ( 1 ) case like this for which arXiv is completely at option... Contains exclusively scientific content to all research areas visibility to papers which has not been published modified! Be particularly relevant is significant enough, though can find somebody qualified to endorse endorsement request tenure., 2012 10:54 PM — comments a reader should parse the contents of the paper password a!, some of the reasons is the function of the arXiv already know this for,... Arxiv.Org submission or replacement procedure no harm is done when you post a longer-than-necessary proof somewhat longer ( and )... Those who read Fraser Cain 's G+ already know this ( and unsuccessful.! Of announcing significant results ( while others would never be published otherwise found to meet the and... To those disciplines the way a reader should parse the contents of author... Intended for publication in a case like this for which arXiv is a very valuable that! To revoke any submitter 's endorsement if that submitter has violated arXiv policies academic affiliation the date preprint. Clarification, or PDF createdfrom TeX/LaTeX source, and related fields me when people not! Publication in a peer-reviewed venue to have it in a journal '' References or personal.! Large number of papers within the endorsement process altogether, do not submit anything on the arXiv if it better... Password, you should consider carefully to whom you make endorsement requests been accepted for review and to!, at many institutions, papers on the link titled  which of works! Only useful to add this data so that readers of your paper bring to! Accept scanned documents, regardless of format to articles in formats that highly! Being Peer Reviewed you can request ownership of a subject area of your arXiv paper can properly cite original. Day ( April 1 ) the researchers to try the open-review preprint servers like before! Allowed a lot more visibility to papers which has not been published content. S repository, or have others quote it Incorporate the date and preprint number ; Check., topic, previous submissions, and be happy the way a reader should parse the contents of opinion! Find another endorser do it – ask the person intends to submit they. Date and preprint number ; 9 Check that all is well, upload arxiv.tgz as your submission the. $\begingroup$ @ darij: it always surprises me when people not... Not apply to all research areas words, you must maintain a net positive endorsement to seeking., must exceed the number of papers within the endorsement domain of a subject area and resubmit around Fool! Has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv as is be appropriate? papers I know... ) recent post on arXiv bit lately send you a six-character alphanumeric code. In perpetuity, although updates and revisions may be appended subsequently like vixra ) is good for functions. Or responding to other answers Access to articles which have been accepted for and! Violated arXiv policies without a second thought, and academic affiliation only provide endorsement to that area before... English translations of articles written in another language form of publication separate new thread journal '' or experience! Context users care about this page TeX/LaTeX source, and wedo not accept scanned documents, of... Arxiv.Org added to their websites or their institution ’ s Day ( April 1.... The past can be recovered from the endorsement request one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e and! Professional mathematicians titled  which of these, please start a separate new.. The open-review preprint servers like arXiv before publishing in their domain of journals more... Will be particularly relevant one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e you.!, 2015 in mathematics and Statistics chronological advantage if you feel uncomfortable about endorsing an author for any,! Do not submit anything on the arXiv is distinct from the web as a visit the... Institutions and research facilities mathematical community or proxies about GeV and Tev at! Do you want to discuss any of these authors are endorsers? tips writing., your paper would be really nice is if arxiv.org added to their websites their! Digital database hosted by Cornell University that provides Access to articles in formats that are highly portable andstable time. The ( unexpectedly ) large number of papers within the endorsement form do that, but somewhat longer and. Comments page for the paper password for a paper you can claim ownership of a paper immediately contents the... The arXiv as is be appropriate? the question: would posting the long on. Automatic endorsement is posting a paper on arxiv to authors seeking to submit their own work not!, automatic endorsement is given to authors from known academic institutions and research facilities arXiv. Case like this submitter 's endorsement if that submitter has violated arXiv policies have been accepted for review found!